Evaluation of Interference During Collaborative Document Development
نویسنده
چکیده
A problem with collaborative development of documents is that people can interfere with each other’s work. If unresolved, this interference can result in an incorrect document. A evaluation scenario using the development of a database design is proposed as a good context for evaluation of collaborative systems for the development of both text and diagram documents. Several metrics and measures are described for quantifying the occurrence of interference. In particular, five survey questions were added to a standard usability instrument to address interference and protection.
منابع مشابه
Development of the Alcohol Policy Document in Iran
Background: Statistics of alcohol use Iran was investigated in the beginning of 2010 in Mental, Social Health and Addiction Department of Ministry of Health. The findings showed that the alcohol use, especially in young people, is notable. Hence a strategic plan or a policy document in alcohol use was needed to explain the main vision also provide countrywide strategies for all related domains ...
متن کاملMulti-User Collaborative Visual Program Development
Visual programming has traditionally supported only one person working on a program at a time. Researchers in the field of computer supported cooperative work have developed text and graphics editors that allow multiple people to work on the same document at the same time from multiple computers viewing the same, shared document. An unresolved problem is how to avoid interference between the us...
متن کاملApplication of Collaborative Care Model on Components of Caregiver Burden in Families of Patients with Mental Disorders
Background: Collaborative care can be used as a component of self-care in reducing the complications of care in family caregivers of mental patients. Therefore, the present study aims to "determine the impact of the use of collaborative care model on the care burden parameters of the family of patients with mental disorders". Methods: In this clinical trial, 66 households from family...
متن کاملThe Potential of Collaborative Document Evaluation for Science (free pre print version)
Peer review and citation analysis are the two most common approaches for quality evaluations of scientific publications, although they are subject to criticism for various reasons. This paper outlines the problems of citation analysis and peer review and introduces Collaborative Document Evaluation as a supplement or possibly even a substitute. Collaborative Document Evaluation aims to enable t...
متن کاملCollaborative Document Evaluation: An Alternative Approach to Classic Peer Review
Research papers are usually evaluated via peer review. However, peer review has limitations in evaluating research papers. In this paper, Scienstein and the new idea of ‘collaborative document evaluation’ are presented. Scienstein is a project to evaluate scientific papers collaboratively based on ratings, links, annotations and classifications by the scientific community using the internet. In...
متن کامل